↓ Skip to main content

A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1009 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration
Published in
Nature, June 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin J. Walsh, Alessandro Morbidelli, Sean N. Raymond, David P. O'Brien, Avi M. Mandell

Abstract

Jupiter and Saturn formed in a few million years (ref. 1) from a gas-dominated protoplanetary disk, and were susceptible to gas-driven migration of their orbits on timescales of only ∼100,000 years (ref. 2). Hydrodynamic simulations show that these giant planets can undergo a two-stage, inward-then-outward, migration. The terrestrial planets finished accreting much later, and their characteristics, including Mars' small mass, are best reproduced by starting from a planetesimal disk with an outer edge at about one astronomical unit from the Sun (1 au is the Earth-Sun distance). Here we report simulations of the early Solar System that show how the inward migration of Jupiter to 1.5 au, and its subsequent outward migration, lead to a planetesimal disk truncated at 1 au; the terrestrial planets then form from this disk over the next 30-50 million years, with an Earth/Mars mass ratio consistent with observations. Scattering by Jupiter initially empties but then repopulates the asteroid belt, with inner-belt bodies originating between 1 and 3 au and outer-belt bodies originating between and beyond the giant planets. This explains the significant compositional differences across the asteroid belt. The key aspect missing from previous models of terrestrial planet formation is the substantial radial migration of the giant planets, which suggests that their behaviour is more similar to that inferred for extrasolar planets than previously thought.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
France 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 472 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 27%
Researcher 90 18%
Student > Master 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 4%
Other 69 14%
Unknown 67 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 180 36%
Physics and Astronomy 178 36%
Chemistry 14 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 22 4%
Unknown 91 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#248,651
of 24,343,193 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,322
of 94,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#772
of 115,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#31
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,343,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.