| Title |
Sick leave due to back pain in a cohort of young workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00420-012-0824-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Van Nieuwenhuyse, A. Burdorf, G. Crombez, G. Verbeke, R. Masschelein, Ph. Mairiaux, G. F. Moens, The BelCoBack Study Group |
| Abstract |
Evidence on risk factors for sick leave from prospective studies in work settings is limited. Furthermore, most available studies focused on workers with substantial low back disorders. These studies consistently report that physical work factors constitute a hindrance to work. However, it remains unclear whether the same risk factors are relevant in workers with less severe conditions or in early phases of the development of back pain. Therefore, this article aims to study risk factors for the occurrence of sick leave due to low back pain (LBP) among young workers with no or a modest history of back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Macao | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 22% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,914,230
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#321
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,413
of 185,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.