↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Coloured Overlays on Reading Ability in Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Coloured Overlays on Reading Ability in Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10803-006-0090-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda K. Ludlow, Arnold J. Wilkins, Pam Heaton

Abstract

Abnormalities of colour perception in children with autistic spectrum disorders have been widely reported anecdotally. However, there is little empirical data linking difficulties in colour perception with academic achievement. The Wilkins Rate of Reading Test was administered with and without Intuitive Coloured Overlays to 19 children with autistic spectrum disorders and to the same number of controls individually matched for age and intelligence. Findings showed that 15 out of 19 (79%) children with autism showed an improvement of at least 5% in reading speed when using a coloured overlay. In contrast only 3 of 19 (16%) control group children showed such an improvement. The findings suggest that coloured overlays may provide a useful support for reading for children with autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 148 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Computer Science 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,385,870
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,466
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,386
of 67,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.