| Title |
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with chronic kidney disease: cross-sectional analysis of a large population cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare MacRae, Stewart Mercer, Bruce Guthrie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 28% |
| Spain | 8 | 22% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,302,149
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#600
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,149
of 527,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#23
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.