| Title |
What’s the point? Retouched bladelet variability in the Protoaurignacian. Results from Fumane, Isturitz, and Les Cottés
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-016-0365-5 |
| Authors |
Armando Falcucci, Marco Peresani, Morgan Roussel, Christian Normand, Marie Soressi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,716,133
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#303
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,131
of 355,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.