↓ Skip to main content

Palaeoecological evidence of a historical collapse of corals at Pelorus Island, inshore Great Barrier Reef, following European settlement

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palaeoecological evidence of a historical collapse of corals at Pelorus Island, inshore Great Barrier Reef, following European settlement
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2013
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.2100
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Roff, Tara R. Clark, Claire E. Reymond, Jian-xin Zhao, Yuexing Feng, Laurence J. McCook, Terence J. Done, John M. Pandolfi

Abstract

The inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) have undergone significant declines in water quality following European settlement (approx. 1870 AD). However, direct evidence of impacts on coral assemblages is limited by a lack of historical baselines prior to the onset of modern monitoring programmes in the early 1980s. Through palaeoecological reconstructions, we report a previously undocumented historical collapse of Acropora assemblages at Pelorus Island (central GBR). High-precision U-series dating of dead Acropora fragments indicates that this collapse occurred between 1920 and 1955, with few dates obtained after 1980. Prior to this event, our results indicate remarkable long-term stability in coral community structure over centennial scales. We suggest that chronic increases in sediment flux and nutrient loading following European settlement acted as the ultimate cause for the lack of recovery of Acropora assemblages following a series of acute disturbance events (SST anomalies, cyclones and flood events). Evidence for major degradation in reef condition owing to human impacts prior to modern ecological surveys indicates that current monitoring of inshore reefs on the GBR may be predicated on a significantly shifted baseline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 32%
Environmental Science 32 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 16%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#748,933
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,843
of 11,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,544
of 290,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.