↓ Skip to main content

Association between maternal nutritional status in pregnancy and offspring cognitive function during childhood and adolescence; a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
503 Mendeley
Title
Association between maternal nutritional status in pregnancy and offspring cognitive function during childhood and adolescence; a systematic review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-1011-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sargoor R. Veena, Catharine R. Gale, Ghattu V. Krishnaveni, Sarah H Kehoe, Krishnamachari Srinivasan, Caroline HD Fall

Abstract

The mother is the only source of nutrition for fetal growth including brain development. Maternal nutritional status (anthropometry, macro- and micro-nutrients) before and/or during pregnancy is therefore a potential predictor of offspring cognitive function. The relationship of maternal nutrition to offspring cognitive function is unclear. This review aims to assess existing evidence linking maternal nutritional status with offspring cognitive function. Exposures considered were maternal BMI, height and weight, micronutrient status (vitamins D, B12, folate and iron) and macronutrient intakes (carbohydrate, protein and fat). The outcome was any measure of cognitive function in children aged <18 years. We considered observational studies and trials with allocation groups that differed by single nutrients. We searched Medline/PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases and reference lists of retrieved literature. Two reviewers independently extracted data from relevant articles. We used methods recommended by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Of 16,143 articles identified, 38 met inclusion criteria. Most studies were observational, and from high-income settings. There were few randomized controlled trials. There was consistent evidence linking maternal obesity with lower cognitive function in children; low maternal BMI has been inadequately studied. Among three studies of maternal vitamin D status, two showed lower cognitive function in children of deficient mothers. One trial of folic acid supplementation showed no effects on the children's cognitive function and evidence from 13 observational studies was mixed. Among seven studies of maternal vitamin B12 status, most showed no association, though two studies in highly deficient populations suggested a possible effect. Four out of six observational studies and two trials (including one in an Iron deficient population) found no association of maternal iron status with offspring cognitive function. One trial of maternal carbohydrate/protein supplementation showed no effects on offspring cognitive function. Current evidence that maternal nutritional status during pregnancy as defined by BMI, single micronutrient studies, or macronutrient intakes influences offspring cognitive function is inconclusive. There is a need for more trials especially in populations with high rates of maternal undernutrition. Registered in PROSPERO CRD42013005702 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 502 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 14%
Student > Bachelor 69 14%
Researcher 52 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 4%
Other 78 16%
Unknown 162 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 6%
Psychology 27 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Other 72 14%
Unknown 187 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,705,653
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#425
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,469
of 355,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#11
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.