| Title |
The SHED-IT Community Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet- and Paper-Based Weight Loss Programs Tailored for Overweight and Obese Men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-012-9424-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip J. Morgan, Robin Callister, Clare E. Collins, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Myles D. Young, Nina Berry, Patrick McElduff, Tracy Burrows, Elroy Aguiar, Kristen L. Saunders |
| Abstract |
There is limited evidence for effective obesity treatment programs that engage men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 18% |
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 50 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,362,883
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#508
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,992
of 183,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.