↓ Skip to main content

Synaptic conditions for auto-associative memory storage and pattern completion in Jensen et al.’s model of hippocampal area CA3

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Synaptic conditions for auto-associative memory storage and pattern completion in Jensen et al.’s model of hippocampal area CA3
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10827-012-0394-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eng Yeow Cheu, Jiali Yu, Chin Hiong Tan, Huajin Tang

Abstract

Jensen et al. (Learn Memory 3(2-3):243-256, 1996b) proposed an auto-associative memory model using an integrated short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) spiking neural network. Their model requires that distinct pyramidal cells encoding different STM patterns are fired in different high-frequency gamma subcycles within each low-frequency theta oscillation. Auto-associative LTM is formed by modifying the recurrent synaptic efficacy between pyramidal cells. In order to store auto-associative LTM correctly, the recurrent synaptic efficacy must be bounded. The synaptic efficacy must be upper bounded to prevent re-firing of pyramidal cells in subsequent gamma subcycles. If cells encoding one memory item were to re-fire synchronously with other cells encoding another item in subsequent gamma subcycle, LTM stored via modifiable recurrent synapses would be corrupted. The synaptic efficacy must also be lower bounded so that memory pattern completion can be performed correctly. This paper uses the original model by Jensen et al. as the basis to illustrate the following points. Firstly, the importance of coordinated long-term memory (LTM) synaptic modification. Secondly, the use of a generic mathematical formulation (spiking response model) that can theoretically extend the results to other spiking network utilizing threshold-fire spiking neuron model. Thirdly, the interaction of long-term and short-term memory networks that possibly explains the asymmetric distribution of spike density in theta cycle through the merger of STM patterns with interaction of LTM network.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Switzerland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 54 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 30%
Student > Master 14 23%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Neuroscience 9 15%
Engineering 7 11%
Psychology 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,256,044
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#168
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,765
of 165,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.