↓ Skip to main content

B cells do not take up bacterial DNA: an essential role for antigen in exposure of DNA to toll‐like receptor‐9

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology & Cell Biology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
B cells do not take up bacterial DNA: an essential role for antigen in exposure of DNA to toll‐like receptor‐9
Published in
Immunology & Cell Biology, October 2010
DOI 10.1038/icb.2010.112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tara L Roberts, Marian L Turner, Jasmyn A Dunn, Petar Lenert, Ian L Ross, Matthew J Sweet, Katryn J Stacey

Abstract

Murine dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages respond to bacterial CpG DNA through toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9). Although it is frequently assumed that bacterial DNA is a direct stimulus for B cells, published work does not reliably show responses of purified B cells. Here we show that purified splenic B cells did not respond to Escherichia coli DNA with induction of CD86, despite readily responding to single-stranded (ss) phosphodiester CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN). This was due to a combination of weak responses to both long and double-stranded (ds) DNA. B-cell DNA uptake was greatly reduced with increasing DNA length. This contrasts with macrophages where DNA uptake and subsequent responses were enhanced with increasing DNA length. However, when DNA was physically linked to hen egg lysozyme (HEL), HEL-specific B cells showed efficient uptake of DNA, and limited proliferation in response to the HEL-DNA complex. We propose that, in the absence of other signals, B cells have poor uptake and responses to long dsDNA to prevent polyclonal activation. Conversely, when DNA is physically linked to a B-cell receptor (BCR) ligand, its uptake is increased, allowing TLR9-dependent B-cell activation in an antigen-specific manner. We could not generate fragments of E. coli DNA by limited DNaseI digestion that could mimic the stimulatory effect of ss CpG ODN on naïve B cells. We suggest that the frequently studied polyclonal B-cell responses to CpG ODN are relevant to therapeutic applications of phosphorothioate-modified CpG-containing ODN, but not to natural responses to foreign or host dsDNA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Singapore 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 35%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Immunology & Cell Biology
#847
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,458
of 108,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology & Cell Biology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.