You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Cilia
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Cilia
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3789-9_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3787-5, 978-1-4939-3789-9
|
| Authors |
Caspary, Tamara, Marazziti, Daniela, Berbari, Nicolas F, Tamara Caspary, Daniela Marazziti, Nicolas F. Berbari, Berbari, Nicolas F. |
| Abstract |
Neuroscientists have been captivated by cilia ever since these slender, microtubule-based projections on the cell body were found to play critical roles in neuronal specification, maintenance, and function. In mammals, the most common cilia marker, acetylated α-tubulin, is extremely difficult to detect in neuronal cilia. Here, we describe methods to detect neuronal cilia in culture, in fixed sections, and in vivo, taking advantage of transgenic mice carrying fluorescently tagged cilia proteins. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#11,274
of 14,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,580
of 405,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,075
of 1,469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.