↓ Skip to main content

Habitual snoring and atopic state: correlations with respiratory function and teeth occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Habitual snoring and atopic state: correlations with respiratory function and teeth occlusion
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Maria Zicari, Giuseppe Marzo, Anna Rugiano, Camilla Celani, Maria Palma Carbone, Simona Tecco, Marzia Duse

Abstract

Allergy represents a risk factor at the base of sleep-disordered breathing in pediatric age. Among allergic diseases, the atopy is characterized by a tendency to be "hyperallergic." Sleep-disordered breathing is also known in orthodontics as correlated with the morphology of craniofacial complex. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between atopy and sleep-disordered breathing (oral breathers with habitual snoring), comparing atopic children with sleep-disordered breathing (test group) with nonatopic ones with sleep-disordered breathing (control group), in the prevalence of dento-skeletal alterations and other risk factors that trigger sleep-disordered breathing, such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy, turbinate hypertrophy, obesity, and alteration of oxygen arterial saturation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#12,864,199
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,543
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,774
of 183,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.