| Title |
Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny McNeill, Fiona Lynn, Fiona Alderdice |
| Abstract |
Maternity care providers, particularly midwives, have a window of opportunity to influence pregnant women about positive health choices. This aim of this paper is to identify evidence of effective public health interventions from good quality systematic reviews that could be conducted by midwives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 21% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#3,710,929
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,571
of 17,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,225
of 198,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.