↓ Skip to main content

New truncation mutation of the NR2E3 gene in a Japanese patient with enhanced S-cone syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
New truncation mutation of the NR2E3 gene in a Japanese patient with enhanced S-cone syndrome
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10384-016-0470-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuki Kuniyoshi, Takaaki Hayashi, Hiroyuki Sakuramoto, Hiroshi Mishima, Hiroshi Tsuneoka, Kazushige Tsunoda, Takeshi Iwata, Yoshikazu Shimomura

Abstract

The enhanced S-cone syndrome (ESCS) is a rare hereditary retinal degeneration that has enhanced short wavelength-sensitive cone (S-cone) functions. The longitudinal clinical course of this disease has been rarely reported, and the genetic aspects of ESCS have not been well investigated in the Japanese population. In this report, we present our clinical and genetic findings for 2 patients with ESCS. The patients were 2 unrelated Japanese men. Standard ophthalmic examinations and mutation screening for the NR2E3 gene were performed. Patient 1 was a 36-year-old man, and his clinical findings were typical of ESCS. His decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.0 OD and 0.5 OS after removal of cataracts. Genetic investigations revealed a homozygous truncation frameshift, the p.I307LfsX33 mutation. Patient 2 was an 11-year-old boy when he was first examined by us. His clinical findings were typical of ESCS except for uveitis in the left eye. His decimal BCVA at the age of 39 years was maintained at 1.5 in each eye, although the retinal degeneration and visual field impairments had progressed during the follow-up period. The genetic investigations revealed homozygous mutations of p.R104Q in the NR2E3 gene. The frameshift mutation, p.I307LfsX33, in the NR2E3 gene is a new causative mutation for ESCS. The clinical observations for patient 2 are the longest ever reported. The retinal degeneration caused by this mutation is slowly progressive, and these patients maintained good vision with maintenance of the foveal structure until their late thirties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#345
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,519
of 354,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.