| Title |
Birds help plants: a meta-analysis of top-down trophic cascades caused by avian predators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-010-1774-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elina Mäntylä, Tero Klemola, Toni Laaksonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Finland | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 314 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 23% |
| Researcher | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 187 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 71 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#303,423
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#18
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#756
of 110,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.