Title |
Study protocol for the 10 Top Tips (10TT) Trial: Randomised controlled trial of habit-based advice for weight control in general practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-667 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca J Beeken, Helen Croker, Stephen Morris, Baptiste Leurent, Rumana Omar, Irwin Nazareth, Jane Wardle |
Abstract |
Primary care is the first port of call for advice about weight control. There is hence a need for simple, effective interventions that can be delivered without specialist skills. We have developed such an intervention; the 10 Top Tips (10TT). This intervention was effective with respect to weight loss in a volunteer population, but has yet to be tested in primary care. The aim of this trial is therefore to test the effectiveness of the 10TT intervention in primary care, incorporating clinical outcomes and health economic analyses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Greece | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 134 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 16% |
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
Psychology | 18 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,671,361
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,652
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,691
of 149,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#163
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.