↓ Skip to main content

Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Clostridium difficile'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Restriction Endonuclease Analysis Typing of Clostridium difficile Isolates
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Direct PCR-Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Clostridium difficile
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Clostridium difficile Genome Editing Using pyrE Alleles
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Fluorescent Reporter for Single Cell Analysis of Gene Expression in Clostridium difficile
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Clostridium difficile
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Intestinal Epithelial Cell Response to Clostridium difficile Flagella
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Clostridium difficile
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Clostridium difficile
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Clostridium difficile
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Clostridium difficile
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Clostridium difficile
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clostridium difficile
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Investigating Transfer of Large Chromosomal Regions Containing the Pathogenicity Locus Between Clostridium difficile Strains
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clostridium difficile
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Clostridium difficile
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Clostridium difficile
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Clostridium difficile
Attention for Chapter 9: Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores
Chapter number 9
Book title
Clostridium difficile
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
Authors

Adrianne N. Edwards, Shonna M. McBride, Edwards, Adrianne N, McBride, Shonna M

Editors

Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany

Abstract

The ability for the obligate anaerobe, Clostridium difficile to form a metabolically dormant spore is critical for the survival of this organism outside of the host. This spore form is resistant to a myriad of environmental stresses, including heat, desiccation, and exposure to disinfectants and antimicrobials. These intrinsic properties of spores allow C. difficile to survive long-term in an oxygenated environment, to be easily transmitted from host-to-host, and to persist within the host following antibiotic treatment. Because of the importance of the spore form to the C. difficile life cycle and treatment and prevention of C. difficile infection (CDI), the isolation and purification of spores are necessary to study the mechanisms of sporulation and germination, investigate spore properties and resistances, and for use in animal models of CDI. Here we provide basic protocols, in vitro growth conditions, and additional considerations for purifying C. difficile spores for a variety of downstream applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 23 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,812,370
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,245
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,794
of 393,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#752
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.