You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An extended theory of planned behavior intervention for older adults with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Aging & Physical Activity, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1123/japa.20.3.281 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine M White, Deborah J Terry, Carolyn Troup, Lynn A Rempel, Paul Norman, Kerry Mummery, Malcolm Riley, Natasha Posner, Justin Kenardy |
| Abstract |
A randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a 4-wk extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) intervention to promote regular physical activity and healthy eating among older adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease (N = 183). Participants completed TPB measures of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention, as well as planning and behavior, at preintervention and 1 wk and 6 wk postintervention for each behavior. No significant time-by-condition effects emerged for healthy eating. For physical activity, significant time-by-condition effects were found for behavior, intention, planning, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norm. In particular, compared with control participants, the intervention group showed short-term improvements in physical activity and planning, with further analyses indicating that the effect of the intervention on behavior was mediated by planning. The results indicate that TPB-based interventions including planning strategies may encourage physical activity among older people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Aging & Physical Activity
#621
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,545
of 248,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Aging & Physical Activity
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.