You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of sensitized Ln( iii ) emission using pyridine - and pyrazine-2,6-dicarboxylates – part II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c2dt32229c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan G. Moore, Jakob Grilj, Eric Vauthey, Paola Ceroni |
| Abstract |
The synthesis, X-ray structures and photophysical properties of several new Ln(III) complexes with the dianion of pyrazine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (H(2)PYZ) that demonstrate excellent stability and solubility in non-aqueous solution are reported, and compared to structurally analogous complexes derived from pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (H(2)DPA). The Eu(III) and Yb(III) complexes demonstrate efficient metal centered luminescence in the visible and Near Infra-Red (NIR) regions, respectively. Low temperature (77 K) phosphorescence measurements using the corresponding Gd(III) complex has allowed the photophysical properties of the sensitizer to be rationalized, together with corresponding TD-DFT studies for a model complex. Lastly, we have evaluated the sensitization efficiencies for these complexes, and have undertaken femtosecond transient absorption (TA) measurements in order to evaluate the relative importance of the intersystem crossing and energy transfer processes involved with sensitized Ln(III) emission via the antennae effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
| Researcher | 9 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 24 | 69% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#23,109,385
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#12,535
of 21,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,621
of 291,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#490
of 1,214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.