| Title |
When wildcats feed on rabbits: an experimental study to understand the taphonomic signature of European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-016-0364-6 |
| Authors |
Lluís Lloveras, Richard Thomas, Alessandra Cosso, César Pinyol, Jordi Nadal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,889,670
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#723
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,114
of 366,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.