You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neutralizing antibody vaccine for pandemic and pre-emergent coronaviruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03594-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin O. Saunders, Esther Lee, Robert Parks, David R. Martinez, Dapeng Li, Haiyan Chen, Robert J. Edwards, Sophie Gobeil, Maggie Barr, Katayoun Mansouri, S. Munir Alam, Laura L. Sutherland, Fangping Cai, Aja M. Sanzone, Madison Berry, Kartik Manne, Kevin W. Bock, Mahnaz Minai, Bianca M. Nagata, Anyway B. Kapingidza, Mihai Azoitei, Longping V. Tse, Trevor D. Scobey, Rachel L. Spreng, R. Wes Rountree, C. Todd DeMarco, Thomas N. Denny, Christopher W. Woods, Elizabeth W. Petzold, Juanjie Tang, Thomas H. Oguin, Gregory D. Sempowski, Matthew Gagne, Daniel C. Douek, Mark A. Tomai, Christopher B. Fox, Robert Seder, Kevin Wiehe, Drew Weissman, Norbert Pardi, Hana Golding, Surender Khurana, Priyamvada Acharya, Hanne Andersen, Mark G. Lewis, Ian N. Moore, David C. Montefiori, Ralph S. Baric, Barton F. Haynes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,441 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 349 | 10% |
| United States | 252 | 7% |
| Brazil | 204 | 6% |
| France | 126 | 4% |
| Canada | 111 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 82 | 2% |
| Spain | 71 | 2% |
| India | 46 | 1% |
| Germany | 40 | 1% |
| Other | 297 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1863 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2981 | 87% |
| Scientists | 296 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 109 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 54 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 260 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,016
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#319
of 98,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166
of 456,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#18
of 912 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 912 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.