You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The afterlife of interviews: explicit ethics and subtle ethics in sensitive or distressing qualitative research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Qualitative Research, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1177/14687941211012924 |
| Authors |
Carla Pascoe Leahy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 50 | 28% |
| Australia | 20 | 11% |
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| Canada | 9 | 5% |
| Ireland | 9 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 52% |
| Scientists | 72 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 38 | 36% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#364,423
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#5
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,489
of 455,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.