↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of amiselimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MOMENTUM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and efficacy of amiselimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MOMENTUM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial
Published in
Lancet Neurology, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30192-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludwig Kappos, Douglas L Arnold, Amit Bar-Or, John Camm, Tobias Derfuss, Bernd C Kieseier, Till Sprenger, Kristin Greenough, Pingping Ni, Tomohiko Harada

Abstract

Patients with multiple sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with autoimmune pathogenesis, have shown partial response to a number of immunomodulating treatments, but the search for more effective, safe, and convenient therapeutic options continues. Amiselimod is an oral selective modulator of sphingosine 1-phosphate 1 (S1P1) receptor, which is being developed for the treatment of various autoimmune-mediated diseases. We assessed the safety and efficacy of amiselimod in patients with relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis. In this double-blind phase 2 trial, patients aged 18-60 years with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis from 84 centres in Europe and Canada were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) with an interactive web-response system to receive once daily oral amiselimod 0·1 mg, 0·2 mg, 0·4 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks. All study personnel, site personnel, investigators, and patients were masked to the treatment assignment during the study. The primary endpoint was the total number of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted lesions on monthly brain MRI scans from weeks 8 to 24. Analysis was done on the predefined evaluable population (all randomised patients who did not have any major protocol deviations, completed 24 weeks of treatment as planned, and had at least three valid post-dose MRI scans). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01742052. Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 24, 2013, 536 patients were screened and 415 patients randomly assigned to amiselimod 0·1 mg (n=105), 0·2 mg (n=103), 0·4 mg (n=104), or placebo (n=103). The median total number of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted lesions from weeks 8 to 24 did not differ between the amiselimod 0·1 mg and placebo groups (median 1·6 lesions [range 0-132] in the placebo group vs 2·0 [0-105] in the 0·1 mg group [median difference 0·0, 95% CI -1·0 to 0·0, p=0·7517]), but was significantly lower in the two higher amiselimod dose groups than in the placebo group (0·0 lesions [range 0-35] in the 0·2 mg group [median difference vs placebo -1·0, 95% CI -1·0 to 0·0, p=0·0021] and 0·0 [range 0-30] in the 0·4 mg group [-1·0, -1·2 to 0·0, p=0·0003]). The estimated incident rate ratio compared with placebo was dose-dependently decreased with amiselimod (0·1 mg 0·53 [95% CI 0·33-0·85; p=0·0079], 0·2 mg 0·39 [95% CI 0·24-0·63; p=0·0001], and 0·4 mg 0·23 [95% CI 0·14-0·38; p<0·0001]). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, including infections and cardiac disorders, were similar in the amiselimod treatment groups (59 [56%] of 105 patients in the 0·1 mg group, 69 [67%] of 103 in the 0·2 mg group, and 58 [56%] of 104 in the 0·4 mg group) to the incidence in the placebo group (66 [64%] of 103 patients); the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (ten [10%], ten [10%], and ten [10%] vs four [4%]) and nasopharyngitis (nine [9%], seven [7%], ten [10%] vs eight [8%]). No serious treatment-emergent adverse event was reported for more than one patient in any group and no clinically significant heart rate reduction was observed at any amiselimod dose. Amiselimod 0·2 mg and 0·4 mg significantly reduced the total number of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted lesions. The safety and efficacy profiles of amiselimod suggest that this S1P1 receptor modulator is a new potential treatment in multiple sclerosis and potentially other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and deserves further investigation. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#638,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#399
of 4,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,981
of 337,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.