↓ Skip to main content

Signalling danger: endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in pancreatic islet inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Signalling danger: endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in pancreatic islet inflammation
Published in
Diabetologia, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-012-2762-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. L. Eizirik, M. Miani, A. K. Cardozo

Abstract

Protein synthesis is increased by several-fold in stimulated pancreatic beta cells. Synthesis and folding of (pro)insulin takes place in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and beta cells trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR) to upgrade the functional capacity of the ER. Prolonged or excessive UPR activation contributes to beta cell dysfunction and death in type 2 diabetes, but there is another side of the UPR that may be of particular relevance for autoimmune type 1 diabetes, namely, the cross-talk between the UPR and innate immunity/inflammation. Recent evidence, discussed in this review, indicates that both saturated fats and inflammatory mediators such as cytokines trigger the UPR in pancreatic beta cells. The UPR potentiates activation of nuclear factor κB, a key regulator of inflammation. Two branches of the UPR, namely IRE1/XBP1s and PERK/ATF4/CHOP, mediate the UPR-induced sensitisation of pancreatic beta cells to the proinflammatory effects of cytokines. This can contribute to the upregulation of local inflammatory mechanisms and the aggravation of insulitis. The dialogue between the UPR and inflammation may provide an explanation for the parallel increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity and type 1 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,158,001
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,156
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,488
of 202,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.