↓ Skip to main content

Effects of resistance exercise in women with or at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 4,595)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Effects of resistance exercise in women with or at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3374-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Simonavice, Jeong-Su Kim, Lynn Panton

Abstract

ᅟ: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) have been told in the past to avoid strenuous repetitive activities in order to decrease the risk of lymphedema development. Recent evidence suggests that exercise may be beneficial to decrease the signs/symptoms and development of lymphedema. This study assessed the arm circumferences of 27 BCS (64 ± 7 years) at baseline and every 2 weeks thereafter during a 6-month resistance exercise training (RT) intervention. RT consisted of 2 days/week of 10 exercises including two sets of 8-12 repetitions at 52-69 % of the participants' one-repetition maximum. A repeated measure analysis of variance revealed no significant changes in percent difference of arm circumferences at any assessment point (pre, 1.31 ± 6.21 %; post, 0.62 ± 6.55 %), nor were there any adverse lymphedema-related events reported during the study. These findings imply that RT can be a safe activity for women with or at risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Sports and Recreations 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#207,266
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#7
of 4,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,690
of 355,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.