| Title |
Economic evaluation of dose–response resistance training in older women: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-010-1356-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. C. Davis, C. A. Marra, M. C. Robertson, K. M. Khan, M. Najafzadeh, M. C. Ashe, T. Liu-Ambrose |
| Abstract |
We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of a once-weekly or twice-weekly resistance training intervention compared with balance and tone classes in terms of falls prevented and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Both resistance training interventions were more likely to save health care resource money and offer better health outcomes for falls prevention than balance and tone classes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,235,968
of 25,088,711 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,259
of 3,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,224
of 100,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,088,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.