| Title |
Medical emergencies on board commercial airlines: is documentation as expected?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11238 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Sand, Stephan Morrosch, Daniel Sand, Peter Altmeyer, Falk G Bechara |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to perform a descriptive, content-based analysis on the different forms of documentation for in-flight medical emergencies that are currently provided in the emergency medical kits on board commercial airlines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 37 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 66% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,467
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,449
of 168,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#67
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.