↓ Skip to main content

The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
The Bologna Process: inception, ‘take up’ and familiarity
Published in
Higher Education, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10734-012-9590-8
Authors

Guy Neave, Amelia Veiga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Portugal 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 43 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Lecturer 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 52%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,320,524
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#1,347
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,571
of 184,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.