↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of asthma control and asthma exacerbations in the epidemiology and natural history of asthma: outcomes and treatment regimens (TENOR) observational cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pulmonology Reports, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of asthma control and asthma exacerbations in the epidemiology and natural history of asthma: outcomes and treatment regimens (TENOR) observational cohort
Published in
Current Pulmonology Reports, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13665-012-0025-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley E. Chipps, Robert S. Zeiger, Alejandro Dorenbaum, Larry Borish, Sally E. Wenzel, Dave P. Miller, Mary Lou Hayden, Eugene R. Bleecker, F. Estelle R. Simons, Stanley J. Szefler, Scott T. Weiss, Tmirah Haselkorn, TENOR Study Group

Abstract

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma account for substantial asthma morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden despite comprising only a small proportion of the total asthma population. TENOR, a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study was initiated in 2001. It enrolled 4,756 adults, adolescents and children with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma who were followed semi-annually and annually for three years, enabling insight to be gained into this understudied population. A broad range of demographic, clinical, and patient self-reported assessments were completed during the follow-up period. Here, we present key findings from the TENOR registry in relation to asthma control and exacerbations, including the identification of specific subgroups found to be at particularly high-risk. Identification of the factors and subgroups associated with poor asthma control and increased risk of exacerbations can help physicians design individual asthma management, and improve asthma-related health outcomes for these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Pulmonology Reports
#96
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,690
of 188,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pulmonology Reports
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.