↓ Skip to main content

To Use or Not to Use – Practitioners’ Perceptions of an Open Web Portal for Young Patients With Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To Use or Not to Use – Practitioners’ Perceptions of an Open Web Portal for Young Patients With Diabetes
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, November 2012
DOI 10.2196/jmir.1987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Nordfeldt, Teresia Ängarne-Lindberg, Carina Berterö

Abstract

Health care professionals' attitudes can be a significant factor in their acceptance and efficient use of information technology, so they need to have more knowledge about this resource to enhance their participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Psychology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Computer Science 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#5,035
of 7,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,075
of 196,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#57
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.