You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
To Use or Not to Use – Practitioners’ Perceptions of an Open Web Portal for Young Patients With Diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.2196/jmir.1987 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sam Nordfeldt, Teresia Ängarne-Lindberg, Carina Berterö |
Abstract |
Health care professionals' attitudes can be a significant factor in their acceptance and efficient use of information technology, so they need to have more knowledge about this resource to enhance their participation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 26% |
Psychology | 13 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#5,035
of 7,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,075
of 196,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#57
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.