↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Breastfeeding on Neuro-Development in Infancy

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Breastfeeding on Neuro-Development in Infancy
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10995-012-1182-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathal McCrory, Aisling Murray

Abstract

The present study examines whether breastfeeding is associated with neuro-developmental advantages at 9 months of age on a standardised measure of infant development in a large cohort study of Irish children. It is hypothesised that if breast-milk confers an independent benefit, infants who were never breastfed will have reached fewer developmental milestones than those who were partially or exclusively breastfed, after controlling for putative confounding variables. Families with infants aged 9-months were recruited as part of a nationally representative sample for the birth cohort of the Growing Up in Ireland study (n = 11,134). Information was collected from mothers on breastfeeding practices, socio-demographic characteristics and developmental progress during a household interview. Parent-report items on development covered communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving and personal-social skills. Analysis of pass/fail status in each developmental domain using binary logistic regression showed a positive effect of any breastfeeding on gross motor, fine motor, problem solving and personal-social skills (but not communication) and these remained after adjustment for a range of confounding variables. There was, however, little evidence of a dose-response effect or advantage of exclusive over partial breastfeeding. A clear advantage of breastfeeding on infant development was demonstrated. However, the lack of a dose-response association on pass rates suggests that the breastfeeding effect may be confounded by other unobserved factors or that there is a critical threshold during which time the effect of breast milk may be particularly salient for bolstering brain development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Psychology 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,917,330
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#813
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,925
of 187,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.