↓ Skip to main content

Sex Effects of Marijuana on Brain Structure and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Current Addiction Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Sex Effects of Marijuana on Brain Structure and Function
Published in
Current Addiction Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40429-016-0114-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Ketcherside, Jessica Baine, Francesca Filbey

Abstract

Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC), the primary ingredient in marijuana, exerts its effects across several neurological and biological systems that interact with the endocrine system. Thus, differential effects of Δ(9)-THC are likely to exist based on sex and hormone levels. We reviewed the existing literature to determine sex-based effects of Δ(9)-THC on neural structure and functioning. The literature demonstrates differences in male and female marijuana users on brain structure, reward processing, attention, motor coordination, and sensitivity to withdrawal. However, inconsistencies exist in the literature regarding how marijuana affects men and women differentially, and more work is needed to understand these mechanisms. While extant literature remains inconclusive, differentiation between male and female marijuana users is likely due to neurological sexual dimorphism and differential social factors at play during development and adulthood. Sex has important implications for marijuana use and the development of cannabis use disorders and should be considered in the development of prevention and treatment strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,549,347
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Current Addiction Reports
#52
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,589
of 355,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Addiction Reports
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.