| Title |
Limb ischemia and pulmonary artery thrombosis after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) vaccine: a case of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.210795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Jones, Annie Boisvert, Jennifer Landry, Paul F Petrasek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 664 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 48 | 7% |
| Japan | 47 | 7% |
| France | 30 | 5% |
| Canada | 24 | 4% |
| United States | 21 | 3% |
| Spain | 13 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% |
| Turkey | 4 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 43 | 6% |
| Unknown | 423 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 628 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 3% |
| Scientists | 9 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 515. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#50,138
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#91
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,690
of 456,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.