↓ Skip to main content

Improving primary care in British Columbia, Canada: evaluation of a peer-to-peer continuing education program for family physicians

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Improving primary care in British Columbia, Canada: evaluation of a peer-to-peer continuing education program for family physicians
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan MacCarthy, Liza Kallstrom, Helena Kadlec, Marcus Hollander

Abstract

An innovative program, the Practice Support Program (PSP), for full-service family physicians and their medical office assistants in primary care practices was recently introduced in British Columbia, Canada. The PSP was jointly approved by both government and physician groups, and is a dynamic, interactive, educational and supportive program that offers peer-to-peer training to physicians and their office staff. Topic areas range from clinical tools/skills to office management relevant to General Practitioner (GP) practices and "doable in real GP time". PSP learning modules consist of three half-day learning sessions interspersed with 6-8 week action periods. At the end of the third learning session, all participants were asked to complete a pen-and-paper survey that asked them to rate (a) their satisfaction with the learning module components, including the content and (b) the perceived impact the learning has had on their practices and patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 29%
Social Sciences 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Psychology 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,175,982
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,275
of 3,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,147
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.