You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels in Japanese Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoshi Ide, Hiromasa Hayama, Yusuke Asai, Mari Terada, Hidetoshi Nomoto, Satoshi Kutsuna, Norio Ohmagari, Yukio Hiroi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 35 | 29% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 99% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#515,319
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#15
of 2,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,399
of 457,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.