You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the Suitability of Written Stroke Materials: An Evaluation of the Interrater Reliability of the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) Checklist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1310/tsr1905-417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tammy Hoffmann, Yvette Ladner |
| Abstract |
Written materials are frequently used to provide education to stroke patients and their carers. However, poor quality materials are a barrier to effective information provision. A quick and reliable method of evaluating material quality is needed. This study evaluated the interrater reliability of the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) checklist in a sample of written stroke education materials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 26% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,320,524
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
#26
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,291
of 352,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.