↓ Skip to main content

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient–ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation delivered by face mask

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient–ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation delivered by face mask
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2626-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise Piquilloud, Didier Tassaux, Emilie Bialais, Bernard Lambermont, Thierry Sottiaux, Jean Roeseler, Pierre-François Laterre, Philippe Jolliet, Jean-Pierre Revelly

Abstract

To determine if, compared to pressure support (PS), neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) reduces patient-ventilator asynchrony in intensive care patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation with an oronasal face mask.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 22%
Other 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Engineering 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,148,915
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,136
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,929
of 164,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.