You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Evolocumab Use Among Asian Subjects ― A Subgroup Analysis of the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk (FOURIER) Trial ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-20-1051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony C. Keech, Kazuma Oyama, Peter S. Sever, Minao Tang, Sabina A. Murphy, Atsushi Hirayama, Chen Lu, Leslie Tay, Prakash C. Deedwania, Chung-Wah Siu, Armando Lira Pineda, Donghoon Choi, Min-Ji Charng, John Amerena, Wan Azman Wan Ahmad, Vijay K. Chopra, Terje R. Pedersen, Robert P. Giugliano, Marc S. Sabatine, on behalf of the FOURIER Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,446,876
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#88
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,425
of 455,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.