| Title |
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Evan’s Blue Dye Test in Detecting Aspiration in Patients with Tracheostomy: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-016-9737-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibylle Béchet, Fiona Hill, Órla Gilheaney, Margaret Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 43% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,152,793
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#204
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,063
of 341,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.