| Title |
Breastfeeding practices in urban and rural Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huong Nguyen Thu, Bo Eriksson, Toan Tran Khanh, Max Petzold, Göran Bondjers, Chuc Nguyen Thi Kim, Liem Nguyen Thanh, Henry Ascher |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to describe and compare breastfeeding practices in rural and urban areas of Vietnam and to study associations with possibly influencing person and household factors. This type of study has not been conducted in Vietnam before. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,731,570
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,029
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,485
of 181,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#106
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.