↓ Skip to main content

The importance of pertussis in older adults: A growing case for reviewing vaccination strategy in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of pertussis in older adults: A growing case for reviewing vaccination strategy in the elderly
Published in
Vaccine, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iman Ridda, Jiehui Kevin Yin, Catherine King, C. Raina MacIntyre, Peter McIntyre

Abstract

Pertussis or whooping cough is increasingly being shown to be a respiratory infection affecting the elderly and a significant percentage of older people infected with Bordetella pertussis experience considerable morbidity and even mortality. However, current knowledge of burden of disease is limited largely to passive surveillance data with little well-designed active surveillance to better ascertain the true burden of pertussis in the elderly, to inform vaccination strategies. The current review aims to identify gaps in knowledge to inform policy considerations relating to pertussis vaccination among the elderly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#788,191
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#680
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,206
of 187,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#3
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.