↓ Skip to main content

The Pharmacological Management of Post-Stroke Muscle Spasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
The Pharmacological Management of Post-Stroke Muscle Spasticity
Published in
Drugs & Aging, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s40266-012-0034-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdel Magid O. Bakheit

Abstract

Muscle hypertonia following upper motor neurone lesions (referred to here as 'spasticity') is a common problem in patients with neurological disease, and its management is one of the major challenges in clinical practice. Understanding the pathogenesis and clinical course of spasticity is essential for the effective management of this condition. The hypertonia initially results from increased excitability of the alpha motor neurones due to an imbalance between the excitatory and inhibitory influences of the vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts. This is the 'neural component' of muscle hypertonia. However, usually within 3-4 weeks, changes in the structure and mechanical properties of the paralysed muscles and the effect of thixotropy also contribute to the hypertonia. The selection of the optimal treatment option is often influenced by whether the neural or the non-neural component is more pronounced. Muscle spasticity often interferes with motor function or causes distressing symptoms, such as painful muscle spasms. If untreated, spasticity may also lead to soft tissue shortening (fixed contractures). However, spasticity can also be beneficial to patients. For example, despite severe leg muscle weakness, most hemiplegic patients are able to walk because the spasticity of the extensor muscles braces the lower limb in a rigid pillar. Other reported benefits of spasticity include the maintenance of muscle bulk and bone mineral density and possibly a reduced risk of lower limb deep vein thrombosis. Several factors, such as skin pressure sores, faecal impaction, urinary tract infections and stones in the urinary bladder, can aggravate muscle spasticity. These factors should always be looked for as their adequate treatment is often sufficient to reduce muscle tone without the need for specific antispasticity medication. Therefore, a careful evaluation of the patient's symptoms and their impact on function, and the setting of clear and realistic therapy goals are important prerequisites to treatment. The best treatment outcomes are usually achieved when pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities are used in tandem. Different drugs are available for the management of spasticity, including oral muscle relaxants, anticonvulsant drugs, intrathecal baclofen, cannabis extract, phenol and alcohol (for peripheral nerve blocks) and botulinum toxin injections. Similarly, there is a range of non-pharmacological methods of treatment, e.g. regular muscle stretching, the use of splints and orthoses, electrical stimulation, etc. Although these are not discussed here, this should not detract from the importance of combining them with antispasticity drugs in order to maximize the clinical benefit of treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Engineering 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,876,020
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#890
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,966
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#31
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.