| Title |
Proteomic Screens for Suppressors of Anoikis Identify IL1RAP as a Promising Surface Target in Ewing SarcomaIL1RAP Is a Promising Surface Target in Ewing Sarcoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hai-Feng Zhang, Christopher S. Hughes, Wei Li, Jian-Zhong He, Didier Surdez, Amal M. El-Naggar, Hongwei Cheng, Anna Prudova, Alberto Delaidelli, Gian Luca Negri, Xiaojun Li, Sofie Ørum-Madsen, Michael M. Lizardo, Htoo Zarni Oo, Shane Colborne, Taras Shyp, Renata Scopim-Ribeiro, Colin A. Hammond, Anne-Chloe Dhez, Sofya Langman, Jonathan K.M. Lim, Sonia H.Y. Kung, Amy Li, Anne Steino, Mads Daugaard, Seth J. Parker, Ramon I. Klein Geltink, Rimas J. Orentas, Li-Yan Xu, Gregg B. Morin, Olivier Delattre, Dimiter S. Dimitrov, Poul H. Sorensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 47% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#226,791
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#83
of 4,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,595
of 458,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#3
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.