↓ Skip to main content

The 2012 John Charnley Award: Clinical Multicenter Studies of the Wear Performance of Highly Crosslinked Remelted Polyethylene in THA

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
The 2012 John Charnley Award: Clinical Multicenter Studies of the Wear Performance of Highly Crosslinked Remelted Polyethylene in THA
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2604-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles R. Bragdon, Michael Doerner, John Martell, Bryan Jarrett, Henrik Palm, Multicenter Study Group, Henrik Malchau

Abstract

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) in THA was developed to reduce particle-induced periprosthetic osteolysis. A series of clinical studies were initiated to determine the clinical efficacy as judged by patient-reported scores, radiographic osteolysis, and wear analysis of one form of HXLPE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Other 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 43%
Engineering 18 18%
Materials Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,586
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,162
of 192,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#94
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.