↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Assessment of the Representativeness of Published Collections of the Traditional Literature on Chinese Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Assessment of the Representativeness of Published Collections of the Traditional Literature on Chinese Medicine
Published in
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1089/acm.2011.0919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian H. May, Yubo Lu, Chuanjian Lu, Anthony L. Zhang, Suyueh Chang, Charlie C.L. Xue

Abstract

The traditional Chinese medical literature provides a substantial resource for natural products research. When undertaking systematic searches, investigators need to assess the scope, content, and relevance of collections both singly and in comparison.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Engineering 2 22%
Chemistry 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#1,806
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,683
of 193,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#43
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.