↓ Skip to main content

CT 検査にて検出困難な魚骨異物症例の検討

Overview of attention for article published in JIBI INKOKA TEMBO, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CT 検査にて検出困難な魚骨異物症例の検討
Published in
JIBI INKOKA TEMBO, August 2017
DOI 10.11453/orltokyo.60.4_189
Authors

井上 なつき, 穐山 直太郎, 柳原 健一, 竹ノ谷 亜希子, 久保田 俊輝, 山口 宗太, 森脇 宏人, 吉川 衛

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JIBI INKOKA TEMBO
#65
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,343
of 327,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JIBI INKOKA TEMBO
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them