↓ Skip to main content

A long‐term evaluation of biopsy darts and DNA to estimate cougar density: An agency‐citizen science collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A long‐term evaluation of biopsy darts and DNA to estimate cougar density: An agency‐citizen science collaboration
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/wsb.675
Authors

Richard A. Beausoleil, Joseph D. Clark, Benjamin T. Maletzke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 47%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#502
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,018
of 369,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.