↓ Skip to main content

Piecing together an integrative taxonomic puzzle: microsatellite, wing shape and aedeagus length analyses of Bactrocera dorsalis s.l. (Diptera: Tephritidae) find no evidence of multiple lineages in a…

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Entomology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Piecing together an integrative taxonomic puzzle: microsatellite, wing shape and aedeagus length analyses of Bactrocera dorsalis s.l. (Diptera: Tephritidae) find no evidence of multiple lineages in a proposed contact zone along the Thai/Malay Peninsula
Published in
Systematic Entomology, August 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00643.x
Authors

MATTHEW N. KROSCH, MARK K. SCHUTZE, KAREN F. ARMSTRONG, YUVARIN BOONTOP, LAURA M. BOYKIN, TONI A. CHAPMAN, ANNA ENGLEZOU, STEPHEN L. CAMERON, ANTHONY R. CLARKE

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 1%
Benin 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,137,494
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Entomology
#988
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,898
of 172,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Entomology
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.