↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology of Escherichia coli ventilator-associated pneumonia: implication of highly virulent extraintestinal pathogenic strains

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Pathophysiology of Escherichia coli ventilator-associated pneumonia: implication of highly virulent extraintestinal pathogenic strains
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2699-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Messika, Fatma Magdoud, Olivier Clermont, Dimitri Margetis, Stéphane Gaudry, Damien Roux, Catherine Branger, Didier Dreyfuss, Erick Denamur, Jean-Damien Ricard

Abstract

To characterize Escherichia coli ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients by determining antibioresistance and genotypic characteristics of E. coli isolates responsible for VAP or lung colonization, by comparing them with their oropharyngeal and rectal counterparts and by assessing representative isolates' virulence in a pneumonia mouse model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,961,675
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,514
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,341
of 172,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.