You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for serum total IgE in diverse study populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Albert M. Levin, Rasika A. Mathias, Lili Huang, Lindsey A. Roth, Denise Daley, Rachel A. Myers, Blanca E. Himes, Isabelle Romieu, Mao Yang, Celeste Eng, Julie E. Park, Karla Zoratti, Christopher R. Gignoux, Dara G. Torgerson, Joshua M. Galanter, Scott Huntsman, Elizabeth A. Nguyen, Allan B. Becker, Moira Chan-Yeung, Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Pui-Yan Kwok, Frank D. Gilliland, W. James Gauderman, Eugene R. Bleecker, Benjamin A. Raby, Deborah A. Meyers, Stephanie J. London, Fernando D. Martinez, Scott T. Weiss, Esteban G. Burchard, Dan L. Nicolae, Carole Ober, Kathleen C. Barnes, L. Keoki Williams |
| Abstract |
IgE is both a marker and mediator of allergic inflammation. Despite reported differences in serum total IgE levels by race-ethnicity, African American and Latino subjects have not been well represented in genetic studies of total IgE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Argentina | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,132,406
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5,576
of 11,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,092
of 194,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#67
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.